Bibliography question
To those of you who have already done this prelim thing:
What is the difference between a "modern" theologian and a "contemporary" theologian?
I'm pretty sure I asked this question at the forum we had a year or so ago, but I've forgotten what the answer was.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Note to Readers
Pretty much everything in this sidebar is WOEFULLY out of date and not actively maintained. Sorry not sorry.
Interesting Stuff
Friends
(for permission to access, email coolclanblog {at} hotmail {dot} com) |
Links
|
Books! Books! Books!
Disclosure: links from this page to commercial sites -- particularly Amazon.com -- may or may not be affiliate links that remunerate the blogger for sales made through said links. In no case does affiliate status affect the opinions offered on this site.
HTML 101: How to add a link
<a href="http://exact-url-
of-site-to-which-you-wish-
to-link-goes-here.com">WORDS TO APPEAR AS LINK</a>
2 comments:
Moderns are dead people.
Contemporaries are still around to read the nasty things you write about them.
Oh, good. That was my operational definition, but I was afraid that some of my moderns might not have been dead long enough to qualify.
Thanks!
Post a Comment